<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisScott.org &#187; TME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisscott.org/tag/tme/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisscott.org</link>
	<description>Tech blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Creating compelling content in the Web 5.0 world</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/creating-compelling-content-in-the-web-50-world</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/creating-compelling-content-in-the-web-50-world#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UGC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa, there. Web 5.0? Okay, so I made up web 5.0. Actually, I detest the numbered generations we&#8217;ve applied to the web. The main problem I have with these terms is that they imply a linear progression. They suggest that we are going to abandon the interactive web, Web 2.0, for the semantic web, Web [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/creating-compelling-content-in-the-web-50-world/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asimov&#8217;s 4th law: A robot will not tweet.</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/software/cms/asimovs-4th-law-a-robot-will-not-tweet</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/software/cms/asimovs-4th-law-a-robot-will-not-tweet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NStein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that might be a bit extreme. At least if they do they should put in a bit more effort. Perhaps I need to explain my problem here. The complaint I have concerns automatic tweets &#8211; popular with bloggers and online publshers in general. Extremely unpersonal, often unhelpful clipits drawing the audiences attention to a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/software/cms/asimovs-4th-law-a-robot-will-not-tweet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

