<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChrisScott.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisscott.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisscott.org</link>
	<description>Tech blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why I would hire a social media expert</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/why-i-would-hire-a-social-media-expert</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/why-i-would-hire-a-social-media-expert#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick one. I came across this post a couple of weeks ago (and just got round to following it up): http://shankman.com/i-will-never-hire-a-social-media-expert-and-neither-should-you/. Basically, @petershankman is very much against the &#8220;Social Media Expert&#8221;. His argument is based upon social media being just one component of a good marketing stratergy &#8211; and not so alien or complex as to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/why-i-would-hire-a-social-media-expert/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Native apps &#8211; a necessary evil?</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/software/native-apps-a-necessary-evil</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/software/native-apps-a-necessary-evil#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently saw a tweet quoting TBL, talking at Profiting From The New Web (which I&#8217;m very sad to have missed!), which went along the lines of: don&#8217;t develop apps, use open standards. It&#8217;s a very interesting instruction. One I used to agree with&#8230; Purely from a technical point of view it is difficult to argue with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/software/native-apps-a-necessary-evil/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m on the Semantic Web! Pt. 2</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/im-on-the-semantic-web-pt-2</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/im-on-the-semantic-web-pt-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semantic web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok. So in the last post I was talking about how I created an RDF graph to describe myself and found that I&#8217;d entered into a huge rambling geekfest about the design of the FOAF vocabluary. So, I decided to cut all of that out and post it here separately. For context, it follows directly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/im-on-the-semantic-web-pt-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m on the Semantic Web!</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/im-on-the-semantic-web</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/im-on-the-semantic-web#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s right. About a fortnight ago I decided it was about time to practice what I preach (well, specifically what I was due to preach at last weeks excellent ePublishing Innovation Forum) and get myself onto the Semantic Web. For those new to the concept of the Semantic Web, I&#8217;m talking about creating an RDF graph which includes a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/im-on-the-semantic-web/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publishing from a Content Hub</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/industry/publishing/publishing-from-a-content-hub</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/industry/publishing/publishing-from-a-content-hub#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Hub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web CMS Working as part of a sales team, one of the questions that I&#8217;m asked again and again – by my management as well as the Marketing department – is “who are your biggest competitors?” For a Web content management system or text analytic tool (Nstein&#8217;s WCM and TME respectively), that&#8217;s a fairly easy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/industry/publishing/publishing-from-a-content-hub/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of video on the web</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/technology/open-source/the-future-of-video-on-the-web</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/technology/open-source/the-future-of-video-on-the-web#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m getting rather excited about video media online. We&#8217;re on the cusp of a revolution in the way we produce and consume the medium. I was working on a project recently which involved video content. It struck me that, although we have come on no end in terms of our ability to distribute video over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/technology/open-source/the-future-of-video-on-the-web/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic Web? What&#8217;s in it for me?</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/semantic-web-whats-in-it-for-me</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/semantic-web-whats-in-it-for-me#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linked data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no doubt about it: the Semantic Web is the hottest thing in the on-line industry at the moment. It&#8217;s all over the web, on the speaker circuits, in multitudes of product labs. On-line publishers are being told again and again that they need to get there content into RDF triplets and create linked data. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/technology/semantic-web/semantic-web-whats-in-it-for-me/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brand: the new pretender</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/industry/publishing/brand-the-new-pretender</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/industry/publishing/brand-the-new-pretender#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Widgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Content is king, is it? Well maybe. There&#8217;s no getting away from the fact that good quality content drives traffic. But in the struggling publishing industry, with waning advertising revenues, we might have to conclude that the current approach to web publishing is just not working. That&#8217;s not to say there aren&#8217;t exceptions. Julian Sambles [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/industry/publishing/brand-the-new-pretender/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source v traditional Software (ding, ding, ding)</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/software/cms/open-source-v-traditional-software-ding-ding-ding</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/software/cms/open-source-v-traditional-software-ding-ding-ding#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the tail end of last month I spent two days attending talks at the yearly Internet World exhibition. I always enjoy listening to speakers and the quality was, by and large, very good. On the final day CMS Watch (@cmswatch) hosted a panel discussion in the Content Management theatre entitled: &#8220;Open Source v Traditional [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/software/cms/open-source-v-traditional-software-ding-ding-ding/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating compelling content in the Web 5.0 world</title>
		<link>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/creating-compelling-content-in-the-web-50-world</link>
		<comments>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/creating-compelling-content-in-the-web-50-world#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UGC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisscott.org/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa, there. Web 5.0? Okay, so I made up web 5.0. Actually, I detest the numbered generations we&#8217;ve applied to the web. The main problem I have with these terms is that they imply a linear progression. They suggest that we are going to abandon the interactive web, Web 2.0, for the semantic web, Web [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisscott.org/social-media/creating-compelling-content-in-the-web-50-world/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

